by James 

Could It Finally Be Time to Learn the Julia Language?

2 Comments

​If you've been working in the data science field for any length of time, you know there are two dominant languages that are used for this purpose: R and Python. The choice between the two has been largely a matter of preference. Both will suffice to give you the tools you need to get a majority of your data science work complete.

If you are new to programming, you will likely read that Python is an easier language to learn. As a computer science major in college and one who has worked in the field for over 22+ years, I concur. Python is easier to learn.

However, once you get cracking with R, and if you choose this language from the start, you'll see why ​it has a cult-like following​. It just makes a lot sense. I can't remember the last time I had to use a loop in this language. Just ​saying... R coders will know what I am talking about.

Julia Lang Screenshot

I was reading​ an article on Data Science Central on how ​a third language, Julia, is starting to make some headway in the ranks. It still has a ways to go and it's pretty low on the list. But, it is creeping up in the ranks.

Personally, I thought Julia was going to explode once everyone found out that execution speed is rather close to that of C/C++. It is significantly faster than both Python and R. I don't know if it was poorly promoted or why it didn't take off, but it didn't. Because of this, it didn't go on my to-do list to learn it.

I held off on learning Julia language mostly because I haven't seen it gain any traction. When you have a lot going on, you have to be selective about what you learn and it didn't make any sense to learn Julia if no one is using it. 

​In the data science article about the three languages (R, Python, and Julia), the author, Steve Miller, writes about how the latest trend seems to be interoperability between languages. This is especially true ​with Python and R. You can find some python libraries that interact with R and R libraries that interact with Python.​

Julia is jumping on that bandwagon too, according to the author. If this trend continues, you won't really have to worry about choosing the wrong language as you can write in whichever one you have been working with. This is good news for the most part. If there is a library that does something one of the three, the interoperability factor will let you have your cake and eat it too.

​​What Mr. Miller wrote about ​should be​ considered a positive development overall. However, as the owner of a review website dedicated to data science, it now looks like I am going to have to learn the Julia language after all. How can I review something I don't know about? Ah well! That is my cross to bear! I'll write a post​ here about my experience when I get around to ​learning Julia.

It's all good!

About the author 

James

James is a data science writer who has several years' experience in writing and technology. He helps others who are trying to break into the technology field like data science. If this is something you've been trying to do, you've come to the right place. You'll find resources to help you accomplish this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  1. People who work in data science have been come from other areas of knowledge, such as mathematics and computer science, which were closest to R and python respectively.
    Julia is a newer language and much of the existing libraries are for R and Python. In time Julia has everything to win!

    1. Hey Francisco, I agree that Julia isn’t going to take over as the main language anytime soon. But, I am reading that it is a decent up and comer. The speed is one of its main benefits which we know is an important component for data science.
      I appreciate your comment.
      Best Regards,
      Jim

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}
Subscribe to get the latest updates